Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flood Web Tools Comparison Matrix - California

Why Use This? This matrix was created to provide the planning and coastal management communities with an expandable chart to compare the functions and methods of publicly available sea level rise and coastal flood web tools. The information in each column is provided by the web tool owner. Specific questions about the tools can be addressed to the tool owner through the contact information provided in their matrix column. For more information or to suggest additional web tools, visit the national matrix page.

The following agencies/organizations contributed to the development of information contained in this California matrix: The Nature Conservancy, NOAA Coastal Services Center, Climate Central, University of California Berkeley Geospatial Innovation Center, California Energy Commission, Point Blue Conservation Science, Gulf of Farallones National Marine Sanctuary, U.S. Geological Survey, Coravai LLC.

Suggested Citation: The Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flood Web Tools Comparison Matrix. The Nature Conservancy, NOAA's Office for Coastal Management, Climate Central. URL, Date Access:

Select Matrix for Another Location:

Tool EMBED Climate Central
Surging Seas
Risk Finder
NOAA's Office for
Coastal Management
Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Impacts Viewer


The Nature
Conservancy
Coastal Resilience
Ventura



CA Energy Commission, CalEPA, CA MTC, CA DOT, and the CA OPC
Pacific Institute: The Impacts of Sea Level
Rise on California's Coast

California Energy Commission; UC-Berkeley Geospatial Innovation Facility
Cal-Adapt: Exploring California's Climate
Point Blue Conservation Science; USGS; Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary; Coravai LCC
Our Coast, Our Future

Tool   Surging Seas
Risk Finder

Climate Central

Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Impacts Viewer
NOAA's Office for
Coastal Management

Coastal Resilience
Ventura

The Nature
Conservancy
The Impacts of Sea Level Rise on California's Coast
Pacific Institute
Exploring California's Climate
The Nature Cal-Adapt

Our Coast, Our Future
Our Coast, Our Future
10GENERAL Geographic Scope Geographic extent the tool defines or covers (i.e. national, statewide, county…) Available for the entire contiguous coastal U.S. -- 22 states and Washington, D.C. -- with releases planned for HI and AK in the future. National (with the exception of AK) Expanding and now includes 14 U.S. coastal states (AL, CA, CT, FL, HI, LA, ME, MS, NJ, NY, NC, TX, VA, WA), the Caribbean (Grenada, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, U.S. Virgin Islands), and across Mexico and Central America (Belize, Guatemala, Honduras). Also global and U.S. national web maps together form the Coastal Resilience network. California California North-central CA Coast (Bodega Head to Half Moon Bay) and San Francisco Bay
10GENERAL Link The URL or link where the tool can be accessed riskfinder.climatecentral.org/ coast.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/tools/slr, coast.noaa.gov/slrdata/ maps.coastalresilience.org http://pacinst.org/publication/the-impacts-of-sea-level-rise-on-the-california-coast/ http://cal-adapt.org/sealevel/ http://pointblue.org/ocof
10GENERAL Description Brief 2-3 sentence description of the purpose of the tool. Searchable web tool providing 1) maps users can customize, embed, & download; 2) downloads: spreadsheets, slideshow-ready tables & graphs, & fact sheets; 3) individual community analyses; 4) area comparisons; 5) local sea level & flood risk projections. 100+ demographic, economic & infrastructure variables analyzed for 1000s of communities from zip code to statewide levels. Tool allows users to visualize community-level impacts from coastal flooding or sea level rise and provides easy access to inundation and elevation data via NOAA's Digital Coast. An online mapping tool customized for local and state decision makers showing potential impacts from sea level rise and coastal hazards designed to help communities develop and implement solutions that incorporate ecosystem-based adaptation approaches Provides access to sea-level rise scenarios generated by the Pacific Institute, ESA PWA and the U.S. Geological Survey as part of the CA Energy Commission's Public Interest Energy Research Program (PIER). The tool shows the threat of coastal erosion and inundation due to flooding over three depths based on a 100 year flood scenario. Currently (spring 2016) provides access to two different sea-level rise flooding models. The first is based on the CoSMoS model developed by USGS to represent sea level rise and storm events, accounting for physical structures, wave dynamics, coastal erosion, and other hydrodynamical factors. These data are available for the Bay Area and outer coast from Bodega Head to just south of Pillar Point Harbor in Half Moon Bay. The second ("bathtub") model represents the open coast as well as Bay Area based on scenarios generated by the Pacific Institute, ESA PWA and the U.S. Geological Survey as part of the Energy Commission's Public Interest Energy Research Program (PIER). ... The tool shows the threat of inundation due to flooding over three depths based on a 100 year flood scenario. NOTE: Cal-Adapt is currently (summer 2016) being migrated to "Cal-Adapt 2.0", which is based on an Applications Programming Interface (API) that enables development of third-party tools. Cal-Adapt 2.0 will also display (summer/fall 2016) 1- results from high-resolution hydrodynamic modeling of extreme storm events + various increments of sea level rise (up to 1.4 m) for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, Bay Area, and open coast; 2- results from an ongoing research project funded by the Energy Commission to produce a probabilistic interpretation of the wide range of plausible sea level rise for California. http://beta.cal-adapt.org/ A collaborative, user-driven project focused on providing San Francisco Bay Area coastal resource and land use managers and planners locally relevant, online maps and tools to help understand, visualize, and anticipate vulnerabilities to sea level rise and storms.
10GENERAL Target Audience The assumed users of the tool (e.g. planners, coastal managers, public) Decision makers, planners, coastal managers, emergency managers, federal and state agencies, journalists and the general public Decision makers, planners, coastal managers, floodplain managers, emergency managers, coastal scientists and engineers, general public Decision makers, planners, coastal managers, emergency managers, coastal scientists and engineers Public, community planners, businesses Public, community planners, businesses, local governments, scientists seeking to coordinate scenarios with those used for California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment Decision makers, planners, coastal managers, floodplain managers, emergency managers, coastal scientists and engineers, general public
10GENERAL Skill Level Low (no formal training other than basic computer skills); Medium (need moderate amount of knowledge about coastal management or processes to interpret results); High (need high level of knowledge to interpret information). Low Low to Medium Low-Medium Low Low Low
10GENERAL Main Tool Outputs Qualitatively different tool functions or modules that a user can take from the tool. For example, a map might be the primary output, however, the tool may also allow the user to comparisons, scenarios or generate reports. Maps, community analyses, wide area analysis comparisons, projections, downloads & reports Maps, sea level rise scenarios, photo simulations, flood frequency graphs Maps (on-screen and pdf), Summary reports (on-screen), Bookmark links, Downloadable spatial data Maps Maps, reports of inundation threat by county Maps (on screen;, summary reports (on screen and pdf); downloadable data; SLR projection comparison by both amount and year
10GENERAL Year Released Year the most current version of the tool was released. Rolling release starting Fall 2013 2011 Gulf of Mexico / 2012 US West and Mid-Atlantic Coasts / 2013 US NW, SW and Pacific Islands / 2014 Puerto Rico, USVI, NE / 2015 Louisianna 2013 2009 May 2014 ("bathtub" model); June 2015 (COSMoS model). Forthcoming in 2016: probabilistic sea level rise projections, Radke et al's modeling of Delta, Bay, and open coast inundation 2013 Half Moon Bay to Bodega Head, 2014 SF Bay
10GENERAL Date Column Last Updated July 2016 April 2017 October 2014 May 2014 April 2016 May 2014
10GENERAL Top Three Strengths As succinctly as possible, list the top three strengths that make this tool unique. 1) Comprehensive tool providing exposure analysis, comparisons, and projections, as well as an interactive map. 2) Analyses cover ~100 variables, and conducted for 1000's of individual areas (zips, cities, counties, states, planning and legislative districts at all levels). 3) Local projections combine sea level rise and storm surge to give integrated risk estimates by decade. 1) Easy to use via Web browser, with GIS analysis results and map services available; 2) Uses consistent data sets and analysis for coastal areas nation-wide; 3) Includes photos and allows users to customize local scenarios and visualize impacts of sea level rise at known locations. 1) DESIGN: The tool has a modular, plugin architecture: Coastal Resilience “apps” can be developed by anyone and plugged into the web-based mapping platform. This allows developers to design a specific application to highlight a coastal management issue, respond to a disaster for post-storm decision making, or emphasize nature-based alternatives; 2) PERFORMANCE: Coastal Resilience 2.0 runs faster; ... operates on tablets; works nationally and globally; is open source, and it’s easy to share results and data; 3) PARTNERSHIPS: Developed among core partners including The Nature Conservancy, University of Southern Mississippi, The Natural Capital Project, NOAA Coastal Services Center, and the Association of State Floodplain Managers 1) First comprehensive analysis of the impacts of sea level rise across the state of California. 2) Considered impacts from several depths of inundation, coastal storms and erosion. 3) Used FEMA's HAZUS model to estimate level of economic risk from inundation 1- Continually updated. 2- Forthcoming enhancements will include detailed representation of potential impacts (with regard to levee overtopping) of sea level rise plus extreme storm events in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta as well as the Bay area and open coast, based on three-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling. 3- Forthcoming enhancements will include probabilistic sea level rise projections to help decision-makers contend with a wide range of plausible SLR values for California. 1) The model underlying the tool, CoSMoS, applies a deterministic modeling framework to cover large geographic scales but with fine local resolution. The system incorporates atmospheric forcing (i.e., wind and pressure fields) from Global Climate Models and accounts for all the relevant physical processes that will contribute to the vulnerability of the coast now and in the future (e.g., SLR, tide, waves, surge, fluvial discharge, storm variability) and the resulting coastal hazards. ... 2) One of the primary objectives of this project is to understand regional coastal flood planning information needs and develop our tools based on those needs. Three scoping meetings with over 140 planners, managers, and scientists were held. In addition, a subset of these attendees took part in an Outer Coast Focus Group to help beta test the North-central coast flood map and a San Francisco Bay Advisory Committee currently advises on the development of the Bay flood map. 3) Three areas of technical assistance is provided: 1. Targeted Trainings to agency/org staff on how to utilize the OCOF decision support tools and apply them to relevant on the ground projects; 2. Integration Support for organizations that want to bring OCOF’s SLR scenarios into their own GIS environment or decision support tool; and 3. Technical Assistance Engagement for organizations that want to use OCOF in a planning process and need assistance with scenario planning, tool modification or application, etc.
10GENERAL Top Three Limitations As succinctly as possible, list the top three weaknesses or limitations that coastal planners or managers might encounter using this tool. 1) Map should not be used for site-specific decisions (supplement with direct field measurements of elevation), as wider-area analyses are more robust than point-by-point mapping; 2) Levee data are incomplete, and maps/analyses incorporating levees assume condition good and heights infinite; 3) No physical modeling of storm surge or waves on top of sea level rise. 1) Inundation scenarios do not include coastal storm surge, riverine flooding, erosion or other coastal processes; 2) Appropriate for use as a screening-level or planning tool allowing zoom in scale of approximately 1:18,055, but provides map services and data download for more in depth analysis. 3.) Includes fully enclosed federal levees as mapped by the USACE National Levee Database. Partially enclosed, regional, or local levees have been added in certain locations. 1) ONLINE-ONLY: No ability to access the tools with limited or lack of connectivity; 2) USER-FRIENDLINESS: Not catered to general public, so training is requirement to engage stakeholders so they can fully utilize the tool and understand the data and analyses; 3) COMMUNICATIONS: With so many tools now available on the web, it is hard to decipher the niche and therefore use of this tool relative to others that address similar issues 1) Elevation dataset is inconsistent in terms of resolution and vertical accuracy, 2) Shoreline location is inexact and probably subjective, 3) Flooding is classified by depth only and does not take into account the flow pathway (i.e. are low lying areas hydrologically connected) Same as Pacific Institute and CoSMoS (original Cal-Adapt site); under development (Cal-Adapt 2.0). 1) No side by side comparisons of scenarios or overlays of different scenarios are provided except in the "Detailed View" which requires more technical expertise (overlays are possible there) ; 2) Doesn't currently model projections of shoreline change specific to SLR and storm scenarios; 3) Labels or tags are not currently provided to help users delineate areas of interest, infrastructure, etc. and actual parcels can't be delineated.
10GENERAL Point of Contact Please give a key contact for questions about the tool and its future development. Name and email address. Dan Rizza: drizza@climatecentral.org John Rozum: john.rozum@noaa.gov Zach Ferdana: zferdana@tnc.org Susan Wilhelm: susan.wilhelm@energy.ca.gov,
or Nancy Thomas: nethomas@berkeley.edu
Juliette Finzi Hart: jfinzihart@usgs.gov
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Base Sea Level Elevation Reference surface for which elevation is zero, such as mean higher high water. All other given elevations are computed as the height above this surface. Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) Total Water Levels - Wave run-up + tides Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) Mean Higher High Water (MHHW)
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Flood/Inundation Controls Method inundation or water levels are changed by the user (e.g. slider bar, radio buttons) Slider bar with inundation delineated in 1 foot increments from 1 - 10 feet. Toggle button to the right of the slider to view inundation ​risk from sea level rise, tides, storms, and tsunamis in meters: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 5, 10, 20 & 30. Slider bar with inundation delineated in 1 foot increments from 0 - 6 feet. Scenarios Tab includes ability to view SLR scenarios by scenario or by year and compare to inunation layers to view impacts. Choice of Current, 2030, 2060, & 2100 projections with choice of Low, Medium & High Sea Level Rise Projection Scenarios for each time horizon and a combination of 3 potential wave climate changes (no change, 500 year wave event, or a doubling of El Nino frequency) None None Total of 40 combinations of sea level rise and storm scenarios that include 0-2 m SLR in 25 cm increments plus a 5 m extreme, and 4 storm scenarios: no storm, annual, 20 year, and 100 year
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Flood Layers Represented How are the inundation or flood level indicated on the map. Does the map use colors to show flooded areas? Blue - inundation; Hatched - low-lying but isolated Blue gradient - inundation depth; Green - low-lying areas Tidal inundation, wave impact, flood inundation, river flood inundation Current water levels, 19", 39" and 55" inundation Current water levels, 19", 39" and 55" inundation Blue gradient - inundation/depth; Green - low-lying areas; Yellow - uncertainty
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Uncertainty Represented Yes/No. Is uncertainty of the flood levels indicated on the map? No for elevation, yes for projections Yes In future version, analysis completed; layers currently under development No No Yes
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Way Uncertainty Represented If uncertainty is represented as indicated in the field above, then how is it represented? Briefly describe. Map does not represent uncertainty in elevation values. However, projection tool presents different sea level rise models and scenarios, and reflects uncertainty information as available for these. Confidence is noted as High vs. Low, so the areas not highlighted as high or low indicate a high confidence of not being inundated: " . . . the blue areas denote locations that may be correctly mapped as "inundated" more than 8 out of 10 times. Areas with low confidence represent location that may be mapped correctly (either as inundated or dry) less than 8 out of 10 times." see above NA NA The "Uncertainty" topic displays layers for the minimum inundation and maximum inundation expected for a particular scenario. These layers represent the +/- 68 cm variations in predicted flooding incurred from the modeling and the DEM base data set.
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Projects local sea level rise Yes/No. Includes localized (not just global) projections for the amount of sea level rise over time. Local projections must take into account regional and local factors such as sinking land. Yes Yes, Scenario and Marsh tabs provide local relative SLR scenarios Yes No No Yes
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Projects future flood elevations Yes/No. Includes projections for how high "standard" floods -- e.g. "1-in-100 year" floods -- will reach in the future, accounting for sea level rise and/or changing storms. Yes No Yes Yes No Yes
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Projects future flood risk at fixed elevations Yes/No. Includes projections for the future annual and/or cumulative risk of floods to fixed elevations -- e.g. 5 ft. above today's sea level -- accounting for sea level rise and/or changing storms. Yes No Yes Yes No Yes
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Projection time periods assessed Include all years/periods for which projections are made. each decade 2020-2100 Yes out to 2100 Current, 2030, 2060, 2100 2100 2100 Tool provided to compare SLR timing/depth estimates from the most commonly cited reports (NRC, COCA, Vermeer & Rahmstorf, IPCC)
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Flood projections factor in changing frequency or intensity of storms Yes/No. Self-explanatory. Not applicable if flood projections not provided. No No Yes No No Flood projections combine SLR and storm intensity (annual, 20-year, 100-year storm)
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Allows choice of projection scenarios/models Yes/No. Choice of emissions scenario or choice of sea level rise model such as NOAA's lowest, intermediate low, intermediate high, or highest sea level rise scenario; USACE lower, middle, or upper sea level rise projections; or the range of IPCC sea level projections. Yes No Yes No No Scenarios are pulled from 4 GCMs and 2 RCP scenarios.
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Shows levees Yes/No. Shows levees on map. Include source of levee information if possible. Yes Yes - Links to USACE NLD Yes No No Yes for San Francisco Bay
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Factors in levees Yes/No. Factors levees into map and any analysis of vulnerable areas. Summarize methods if possible. Yes Yes, using FEMA base flood elevations. Yes NA NA Yes for San Francisco Bay
20SLR AND FLOOD SCENARIOS Inundation Model Used Briefly and as non-technical as possible, describe the modeling method used. Modified bathtub approach, modeling hydrologic connectivity and locally adjusted Mean Higher High Water levels. Modified bathtub approach, modeling hydraulic connectivity and locally adjusted Mean Higher High Water levels. HEC-GeoRAS tool in ArcGIS outputs for river flooding , FEMA overtopping model used results projected against topographic surface composite Bathtub approach Bathtub approach USGS Coastal Storm Modeling System (CoSMoS), which uses Delft3D-Flow and XBeach for flooding predictions
30EXPOSURE ANALYSIS Tabulates exposure within designated areas Yes/No. Gives total land, housing, etc. exposed at different flood or sea levels, within units such as cities or counties Yes no just overlay visualization of social and economic data Can be queried using existing GIS tools Yes, determines acres and percentage at risk with 1.4 meters SL R by county Yes, determines acres and percentage at risk with 1.4 meters SLR by county (bathtub model) or 1.5 meters SLR by county (CoSMoS model) Yes - report gives exposure and flood depth for user defined area
30EXPOSURE ANALYSIS Exposure types tabulated Variables analyzed, such as land, housing, property value, population, roads, airports or other infrastructure >100 demographic, economic, environmental and infrastructure variables No No Results of FEMA's Hazus model are available for download NA No
30EXPOSURE ANALYSIS Designated areas for tabulation Geographic units within which exposure is tabulated, such as cities, counties, states or zip codes zip codes, cities, counties, states, local through federal legislative districts, planning districts, state agency districts No User defined County County (original Cal-Adapt); additional areas including political district boundaries, census tracts, census places) forthcoming with Cal-Adapt 2.0 User drawn polygons or uploaded polygon
30EXPOSURE ANALYSIS Shows or lists individual exposed facilities or public infrastructure Yes/No. Tool is able to give the user output that would allow them to evaluate potential vulnerable facilities and/or public infrastructure. Output could be either a map, or a report/listing. Lists all facilities analyzed in tables for download. Shows select facilities and infrastructure on map. No Different data layers can be viewed with hazards to determine individual exposed facilities or public infrastructure Yes No Yes through additional data layers that can be viewed such as "Roads and Transportation," "Buildings," and "Utilities Services"
30EXPOSURE ANALYSIS Compares exposure across designated areas Yes/No. Includes display (e.g. heat map) showing how different areas compare (e.g. how do counties compare for exposure of housing) Yes No No No No Only by comparing separate reports
40SHORELINE PROCESSES Other Flooding Scenarios Modeled Other than the model scenarios above, are there other flooding scenarios mapped? (i.e. specific storm scenarios, shallow coastal flooding, base flood elevations) Fully integrated analysis of SLR projections with flood risk Shallow (Nuisance) Coastal Flood Frequency Wave impact and river flood inundation No No Waves: displays layers for wave height along shore and the magnitude and location of the maximum wave heights (and maximum wave run-up?) for each combination of sea level rise and storm scenarios. Current: displays layers for the velocity of the ocean waters near shore for each combination of sea level rise and storm scenarios.
40SHORELINE PROCESSES Coastal Erosion Yes/No. Does the method used take coastal erosion processes into account? No No Yes - acceleration of coastal erosion Yes Yes (CoSMoS model); no (bathtub model). Storm related response only. However, the future shoreline position has been projected for 2030, 2050, and 2100 based on the historical rates of change reported in the USGS National Assessment of Shoreline Change for the California coast (http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1219/). This is available as an additional data layer.
40SHORELINE PROCESSES Sediment Dynamics/Deposition Yes/No. Does the method used take coastal sediment dynamics and deposition into account? No No Yes - indirect accounting of coastal sediment budget, sediment yield from watersheds calculated No No Yes: along North-central open coast (event-based) and inside San Francisco Bay (marsh accretion and vertical land movement); No: inside lagoons/bays on North-central coast
40SHORELINE PROCESSES Storm Events Yes/No. Does the method used take the impacts of future storm events into account? Fully integrated analysis of SLR projections with flood risk No Yes - wave impact, flood inundation and river flood inundation (large storm) Yes, shows effect of a 100-yr coastal storm event with
1.4 meter SLR
Yes Yes, each simulation includes all the relevant components of each storm scenario, including sea level rise, tidal currents, surge (driven by wind and atmospheric pressure), river discharge (SF Bay only), steric effects, and waves.
40SHORELINE PROCESSES Habitat/Species Change Yes/No. Does the method allow the user to visualize potential impacts to habitats and changes in species distribution? No No No No No Shorebird species richness based on current beach extent.
40SHORELINE PROCESSES Marsh Migration Yes/No. Does the method allow the user to visualize the potential impacts to coastal marshes and how they may migrate with rising sea level? No Yes Future scenarios analyzed using SLAMM for tidal influenced wetlands No No Future marsh migration for each scenario is included in uncertainty projections for SF Bay
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Basemap Options What types of base map(s) are used in the tool? (e.g. satellite imagery, topographic, streets, hybrid maps) Satellite, Streets Satellite, Open Streetmap, Dark Topographic, National Geographic, Ocean, Imagery, Physical, Shaded Relief, Streets, Terrain Google map interface for inundation maps. Static PDF Quad maps of inundation and hazards. Satellite, Streets ESRI Aerial Imagery, USGS DEM shaded relief, Google Aerial/Ocean Imagery, Streets, other layers
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Main elevation data source Examples include LIDAR or National Elevation Dataset. Lidar Lidar 2009 – 2011 California Coastal Conservancy Coastal LiDAR Project Hydro-Flattened Bare Earth DEM Patchwork of datasets to complete California coast, including LiDAR, IFSAR, and other methods. Each method has different horizontal resolution and vertical accuracy Same as Our Coast, Our Future (COSMoS model); same as Pacific Institute (bathtub model) LIDAR data from three 2010 surveys: USGS, California State Ocean Protection Council (OPC), and the Golden Gate Lidar Project. See here for the spatial coverage of each survey. The other primary data for the DEM are depth soundings collected using multibeam bathymetry as part of the California Seafloor Mapping Project, a collaborative, multi-institutional campaign.
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Main elevation data source vertical accuracy Published error. Use maximum error, or accuracy standard, when different sub-datasets have different error. (same as NOAA) NOAA/USGS specs 9.25cm RMSE (+/-) 9cm Used a variety of data sources. Accuracy range from 7.5 - 0.7 meters Used a variety of data sources. Accuracy range from 7.5 - 0.7 meters 9 cm RMSE
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Horizontal resolution Dimension of elevation grid cell size. 5 Meters (~15 feet) 5 Meters (~15 feet) (+/-) 1 meter 2 meters to 10 meters 2 meters to 10 meters 2 meters
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Other Available Data Layers Beyond the inundation/flooding layers, what other unique data layers are available? On map: Social Vulnerability, Population Density, Ethnicity, Income, Property, Landmarks. In analysis and comparison tools: about 100 population and infrastructure variables. Flood Frequency, Social and Economic Vulnerability at Census block groups, Marsh Impacts, Photo visualizations of key landmarks Infrastructure, Land Use/Zoning, Natural Resources, Socioeconomic data All flood layers and scenarios for future sea level, critical infrastructure, shoreline protection, schools, police and fire stations, census boundaries and data. None Placenames, Land Use, Protected Areas, Rivers and Streams, Cliff and Shoreline Retreat, Shorebirds, Coastal Armoring, Roads and Transportation, Trails, Buildings, Utilities and Services
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Place name searchable Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Maximum Zoom-in What is the farthest in a user can zoom in with the tool? 1:4,500 Tile cached data to 1:18,055 Tile cached data to 1:5,000 1:60,600 1:60,600 Tile cached data to zoom level 19 (about 1:800)
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Map Services Available Yes/No. Are the data layers in the tool available as map services that can be accessed by the public? No Yes Yes No No Upon request
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Data Download Available Yes/No. Are the data layers in the tool available for download by the public? Yes Yes Yes Yes - Via linked original sources Yes - Via linked original sources Yes
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS If data download available, please list types If answered yes for Data Download Available, please list the layers that are available for download. Summary tables and detailed lists in Excel for 100+ demographic, economic, infrastructure and environmental variables, tabulated by state, county, municipality, zip code, planning and legislative districts, & more Inundation, confidence, shallow coastal flooding, SOVI, and DEMs, and Marsh migration upon request Various DEM data available here; Flood extent and depth available through online tool; all other layers available upon request to Point Blue
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Does tool use other map services? Yes/No. Does the tool consume other map services from other providers as a part of the tool? If so, which ones. (please specify) No Yes, ESRI Basemaps FEMA, NOAA, USGS, UNISDR No No Yes. Google, ESRI, California Climate Commons
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Additional Software Needed Yes/No. Does the user require additional software in order to use the tool? No No No No No No
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Cross Platform Yes/No. Is the tool platform and operating system independent? (i.e. can it operate on all computer platforms equally well) Yes (modern browsers) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
50TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Mobile Compatible Yes/No. Will the tool operate on any mobile platform (e.g. iPad, iPhone, Android)? On modern tablets/phones Yes, but not phones Yes Works, but not responsive Works, but not responsive (original Cal-Adapt). Works and responsive (Cal-Adapt 2.0, forthcoming) Yes
60OTHER Training Requirements Does the tool require training before it can be used efficiently? None but support available as needed. None None but suggested None None None, but project team provides directed trainings for Bay Area agencies through targeted outreach
60OTHER Documentation, Training & Technical Resources Describe the types of documentation on tool methods and training resources available. Research papers for each state, FAQs, methodologies, tutorials FAQs, methodologies, and related technical documents; brief "First Time Tips" video; 56-minute recorded webinar, In-person or online training available upon request Video tutorials for: General Navigation; Scenario Planning; video simulations for apps including Flood & Sea Level Rise, Coastal Defense and Risk Explorer. Metadata and methods documented and accessible within the tool. Associated website for FAQ and project information Report from Pacific Institute For COSMoS model, users are referred to Point Blue's Our Coast, Our Future for additional resources:Point Blue's Our Coast.
For the "bathtub" mode, users are referred a report from Pacific Institute
3 FAQs: OCOF, CoSMoS, and Known Issues; Get Started website page that walks the user through utilizing the tool and data for the first time; 2 Video Tutorials: general project overview and mapping tool; References: list of citations supporting the research behind the OCOF modeling results.
60OTHER Is the tool based on, or featured in, any peer-reviewed publication(s)? If so, please list. (INCLUDE LINKS IF AVAILABLE) Please list the peer-reviewed publications that the tool, or underlying model, has discussed and/or featured the tool. Based on Strauss et al 2012 and Tebaldi et al 2012, Environmental Research Letters. Featured in Wong-Parodi G, Fischhoff B, and Strauss BH (2014) Climatic Change, 1-9, Stephens et al 2014 Science Communication, and the Science of Science Communication II Sackler Colloquium PNAS 2014. Marcy, et al., 2011. “New Mapping Tool and Techniques for Visualizing Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Impacts.” In Proceedings of the 2011 Solutions to Coastal Disasters Conference, Anchorage, Alaska, June 26 to June 29, 2011, edited by Louise A. Wallendorf, Chris Jones, Lesley Ewing, and Bob Battalio, 474–90. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers. Yes, various publications listed here Revell et al., 2011 (referred to in Model matrix. Reference needed) The Impacts of Sea-Level Rise On the California Coast. Matthew Heberger, Heather Cooley, and Pablo Herrera, Peter H. Gleick. PIER: 2009 North-central CA coast DEM, Barnard, P.L., van Ormondt, M., Erikson, L.H., Eshleman, J., Hapke, C., Ruggiero, P., Adams, P.N. and Foxgrover, A.C., 2014. Development of the Coastal Storm Modeling System (CoSMoS) for predicting the impact of storms on high-energy, active-margin coasts. Natural Hazards, Volume 74 (2), p. 1095-1125, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1236-y
60OTHER Costs Are there costs involved in using this tool? Does the user community bear any of the development cost directly? None None Free of charge. Open source code for the tool framework and individual apps are available under a GNU General Public License, version 3 agreement at https://github.com/CoastalResilienceNetwork None None None
60OTHER Are Future Versions Planned? Please describe if there are plans for future improvements to the tool. Yes Version 3.0 released in 2017 Yes. Tool framework https://github.com/CoastalResilienceNetwork/GeositeFramework being upgraded on GitHub in 2015-2016 as well as individual browser-based apps (Coastal Resilience 3.0) No planned update Yes. Ongoing enhancements under Cal-Adapt 2.0 will incorporate data from California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment regarding probablistic sea level rise projections and will also incorporate data based on Radke et al's high-resolution, three-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, Bay Area, and open coast. Yes, based on securing additional funds.